Banks and credit unions running 2× their peer cohort's nonperforming ratio
Institutions whose nonperforming-loan ratio is at least twice the median for their size cohort — surfaces outliers that are running well above peers regardless of absolute level.
| Rank | Institution | Source | State | NPL % vs Peer | QoQ | Trend | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | ALLOY EMPLOYEES | CU | WI | 68.4% | +50.3 | ||
| 2 | MT ZION WOODLAWN | CU | OH | 45.1% | +3.8 | ||
| 3 | NRS COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT | CU | AL | 42.7% | +7.9 | ||
| 4 | MOUNT VERNON BAPTIST CHURCH | CU | NC | 41.2% | +37.3 | ||
| 5 | BEAL BANK | BANK | TX | 33.6% | +28.4 | ||
| 6 | PEAR ORCHARD | CU | TX | 31.7% | +1.3 | ||
| 7 | ST. ATHANASIUS | CU | IA | 28.7% | +16.8 | ||
| 8 | HILL DISTRICT | CU | PA | 27.8% | +3.2 | ||
| 9 | BYKOTA | CU | NY | 26.0% | -9.4 | ||
| 10 | FAR ROCKAWAY POSTAL | CU | NY | 25.5% | +8.1 | ||
40 more institutions match this list. Unlock metric values for every row and column sort with Foundation. Unlock with Foundation | |||||||
See 40 more →
| Rank | Institution | Source | State | NPL % vs Peer | QoQ | Trend | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 11 | EMPOWERMENT COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT | CU | TX | ████ | ████ | ████ | |
| 12 | WEDEVELOPMENT | CU | MO | ████ | ████ | ████ | |
| 13 | NANO BANC | BANK | CA | ████ | ████ | ████ | |
| 14 | MERIDEN POSTAL EMPLOYEES | CU | CT | ████ | ████ | ████ | |
| 15 | FIRST UNITY | CU | MS | ████ | ████ | ████ | |
| 16 | ISSAQUENA COUNTY | CU | MS | ████ | ████ | ████ | |
| 17 | WRIGHT-DUNBAR AREA | CU | OH | ████ | ████ | ████ | |
| 18 | NEW LIFE | CU | PA | ████ | ████ | ████ | |
| 19 | COLUMBIA SAVINGS&LOAN ASSN | BANK | WI | ████ | ████ | ████ | |
| 20 | FIRST&PEOPLES BANK&TRUST CO | BANK | KY | ████ | ████ | ████ | |
| 21 | UNION BAPTIST GREENBURGH | CU | NY | ████ | ████ | ████ | |
| 22 | CHICAGO AVENUE GARAGE | CU | IL | ████ | ████ | ████ | |
| 23 | CALIFORNIA PACIFIC BANK | BANK | CA | ████ | ████ | ████ | |
| 24 | JOHN WESLEY AME ZION CHURCH | CU | DC | ████ | ████ | ████ | |
| 25 | SHAKER HEIGHTS | CU | OH | ████ | ████ | ████ | |
| 26 | GRAND RIVERS COMMUNITY BANK | BANK | IL | ████ | ████ | ████ | |
| 27 | PLAINFIELD POLICE & FIREMEN'S | CU | NJ | ████ | ████ | ████ | |
| 28 | GLAMORGAN EMPLOYEES | CU | VA | ████ | ████ | ████ | |
| 29 | PEOPLE TRUST COMMUNITY | CU | AR | ████ | ████ | ████ | |
| 30 | SPC BROOKLYN | CU | NY | ████ | ████ | ████ | |
| 31 | MIDFIRST BANK | BANK | OK | ████ | ████ | ████ | |
| 32 | SIXTH AVENUE BAPTIST | CU | AL | ████ | ████ | ████ | |
| 33 | HEEKIN CAN EMPL | CU | OH | ████ | ████ | ████ | |
| 34 | GUERNSEY COMMUNITY | CU | WY | ████ | ████ | ████ | |
| 35 | GARY POLICE DEPARTMENT EMPLOYEES | CU | IN | ████ | ████ | ████ | |
| 36 | LOCAL 355 MD | CU | MD | ████ | ████ | ████ | |
| 37 | CITY OF FAIRMONT | CU | WV | ████ | ████ | ████ | |
| 38 | LOS ANGELES LEE | CU | CA | ████ | ████ | ████ | |
| 39 | CHESTERFIELD STATE BANK | BANK | IL | ████ | ████ | ████ | |
| 40 | BASF CHATTANOOGA | CU | TN | ████ | ████ | ████ | |
| 41 | AKRON | CU | CO | ████ | ████ | ████ | |
| 42 | RED RIVER STATE BANK | BANK | MN | ████ | ████ | ████ | |
| 43 | ISRAEL MEMORIAL A M E | CU | NJ | ████ | ████ | ████ | |
| 44 | SYMPHONY | CU | MA | ████ | ████ | ████ | |
| 45 | WASHITA VALLEY BANK | BANK | OK | ████ | ████ | ████ | |
| 46 | FARMERS BRANCH CITY EMPLOYEES | CU | TX | ████ | ████ | ████ | |
| 47 | BERKSHIRE BANK | BANK | NY | ████ | ████ | ████ | |
| 48 | FRIONA TEXAS | CU | TX | ████ | ████ | ████ | |
| 49 | TAYCO EMPLOYEES | CU | KY | ████ | ████ | ████ | |
| 50 | GARY FIREFIGHTERS ASSOCIATION | CU | IN | ████ | ████ | ████ |
Methodology
We rank institutions whose nonperforming-loan ratio meets or exceeds 2× their size-cohort peer median. For each institution we compare nonperforming_pct_total against peer_median_nonperforming_pct (the median nonperforming ratio across all active institutions in the same size cohort and quarter) and require the institution's ratio to be greater than or equal to the multiple (thresholds.peerMultiple = 2) times the peer median. Results are sorted by peer_deviation_nonperforming_pct (institution minus peer median) in descending order, so the largest absolute outliers float to the top of the list. For banks (FDIC-insured): non-current loans — FFIEC Call Report Schedule RC-N line 9, 90+ days past due col B (RCFD1407 / RCON1407) plus nonaccrual col C (RCFD1403 / RCON1403); total loans denominator — Schedule RC-C line 12 (RCFD2122 / RCON2122). For credit unions: 60+ days delinquent — NCUA ACCT_041B (direct aggregate); total loans denominator — NCUA ACCT_025B. Size cohorts and peer medians are computed during the per-quarter normalize step. Cross-type comparability: bank "non-current" and CU "60+ delinquent" are LCD approximations, not equivalents. Methodology updated 2026-03-31: bank non-current loan volumes now source directly from FFIEC Call Report Schedule RC-N. Prior quarters used a BankFind ratio-derived approximation, which means today's peer-deviation rankings reflect a more precise denominator on the bank side. Read the methodology update note at /blog/npl-explorer-fdic-cdr-direct-sourcing.